Wave vs Read.ai
Read.ai is meeting intelligence: a bot joins your video calls and produces summaries plus engagement metrics, sentiment, and speaker coaching. Wave is conversation capture: it records video calls, phone calls, and in-person meetings — with or without a bot — and hands you speaker-labeled transcripts, AI summaries, and action items.
Read.ai and Wave overlap on the obvious job — an AI that attends your meeting and writes the notes — but they are optimized for different buyers. Read.ai leans into analytics: engagement scores, talk-time balance, sentiment, and coaching reports layered on top of its meeting summaries, plus a “copilot everywhere” push into email and messaging summaries. Wave leans into capture: recording every kind of conversation you actually have, wherever it happens.
How they capture audio
Read.ai captures meetings the way most meeting-intelligence tools do: a bot joins your scheduled video call and processes what the platform sends it. If the conversation is not a video meeting with a join link, there is nothing for Read.ai to attend. Its mobile experience is primarily a viewer for notes, not a recorder.
Wave records four ways:
- In-person, on your phone or Apple Watch. Press record on iPhone, Android, or your wrist and capture the room — interviews, client meetings, hallway conversations.
- Phone calls. The built-in Phone Bridge records incoming and outgoing calls on iPhone and Android, both sides transcribed.
- Calendar meeting bot. Connect Google Calendar or Outlook and a Wave bot auto-joins Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams calls — same coverage as Read.ai’s bot.
- System audio on the desktop. Wave Desktop for Mac and Windows captures mic + system audio directly, so nothing visible joins the call.
Notes vs analytics
Both tools produce transcripts and AI summaries. Read.ai goes further into measurement — engagement and sentiment scores, talk-time breakdowns, coaching metrics. Some managers love that; plenty of participants find being scored in every meeting uncomfortable, and some teams disable it for exactly that reason. Wave keeps the output focused on the conversation itself: a speaker-labeled transcript, a summary with decisions and action items, and a chat that answers questions from any past recording.
Where each tool wins
Pick Read.ai if: your meetings are all scheduled video calls and you specifically want engagement analytics, sentiment scoring, and coaching reports across your team’s meetings.
Pick Wave if: you want every conversation captured — phone calls, in-person meetings, lectures, video calls with or without a bot — with clean notes and a searchable archive, minus the surveillance-adjacent scoring. See all the ways to record with Wave.
The bottom line
Read.ai is a meeting-analytics product with notes attached. Wave is a conversation-capture product with notes at the center. If your conversations extend past scheduled video calls, Wave covers ground Read.ai cannot reach. Weighing more options? See the best Read.ai alternatives.
